Programming Tutorials

What are Wait-Die and Wound-Wait?

"Wait-Die" and "Wound-Wait" schemes in DBMS in simple terms

Let’s understand “Wait-Die” and “Wound-Wait” schemes in DBMS in simple terms, along with examples.


What are Wait-Die and Wound-Wait?

These are deadlock prevention techniques used in database transaction management. They decide how to handle a situation where two transactions want to lock the same resource, potentially causing a deadlock.

Advertisement

The two schemes use the timestamp of a transaction to make decisions. The timestamp (TS) is a unique number that represents the time when the transaction started.

  • Older transaction: The one with the smaller timestamp (TS).
  • Younger transaction: The one with the larger timestamp (TS).

1. Wait-Die Scheme

  • Rule:
    • If an older transaction requests a resource held by a younger transaction, it is allowed to wait.
    • If a younger transaction requests a resource held by an older transaction, it is aborted (dies) and restarted with the same timestamp.

Purpose: Prevents deadlock by ensuring that younger transactions are forced to die when they conflict with older ones.

Advertisement

Example (Wait-Die):

  • T1 (TS = 10) (older) and T2 (TS = 20) (younger):
    1. T1 wants a lock held by T2:
      • Since T1 is older, T1 waits.
    2. T2 wants a lock held by T1:
      • Since T2 is younger, T2 dies (aborted) and is restarted.

2. Wound-Wait Scheme

  • Rule:
    • If an older transaction requests a resource held by a younger transaction, it forces the younger transaction to release the resource (wound). The younger transaction is aborted.
    • If a younger transaction requests a resource held by an older transaction, it is allowed to wait.

Purpose: Prevents deadlock by ensuring that older transactions take precedence over younger ones.


Example (Wound-Wait):

  • T1 (TS = 10) (older) and T2 (TS = 20) (younger):
    1. T1 wants a lock held by T2:
      • Since T1 is older, T2 is wounded (aborted) and restarted.
    2. T2 wants a lock held by T1:
      • Since T2 is younger, T2 waits.

Key Differences Between Wait-Die and Wound-Wait:

Aspect Wait-Die Wound-Wait
Older transaction Waits for the resource. Forces younger transaction to abort.
Younger transaction Aborts (dies) and restarts. Waits for the resource.
Strategy Non-preemptive (older waits). Preemptive (older wounds younger).
Abortion direction Younger transaction dies. Younger transaction is wounded.

Simplified Example (Lock Conflict):

Transaction Action Result in Wait-Die Result in Wound-Wait
T1 (older) Requests lock held by T2 (younger) T1 waits. T2 aborts (wounded).
T2 (younger) Requests lock held by T1 (older) T2 aborts (dies). T2 waits.

Conclusion:

Both Wait-Die and Wound-Wait are effective in preventing deadlocks by using timestamps.

  • Wait-Die is more conservative (younger transactions die often).
  • Wound-Wait is more aggressive (older transactions wound younger ones).

RochakGuy

Hi, I'm Piyush and I'm a passionate blogger. I love sharing my insights on Rochaksite.com. I'm committed to providing practical and informative content that helps readers achieve their goals and make informed decisions. When I'm not writing, I enjoy exploring new topics and trends in Technology and indulging in my personal hobbies and interests.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button